This is a previous project site under CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE). For more information and current updates, visit the WLE website.

Home > Imported > Learning is Engagement

How do we learn? According to psychologist David Kolb, through experience. Kolb is the founder of the experiential theory of learning which says learning is, “the process whereby knowledge is created through the transformation of experience [and] results from the combination of grasping and transforming experience.”

Learning through engagement.  Photo: Swathi Sridharan on Flickr

Learning through engagement. Photo: Swathi Sridharan on Flickr

How many of us truly love “grasping and transforming experience”?

For researchers trying to get from outputs to outcomes, one way to grasp experience is set up an ‘engagement platform’. In general terms, an engagement platform is an opportunity for individuals and people representing organizations with different backgrounds and interests to come together to diagnose problems, identify opportunities and implement solutions. We say ‘opportunity’ because an engagement platform is not a committee and you can never be sure what’s going to emerge from the grasping and transforming.

Over the past ten years, the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF) has used engagement platforms across a wide range of scales to address an equally wide range of challenges. We recently prepared a brief note on CPWF experiences for Africa Agriculture Science Week titled “Seven ways to catalyze African innovation through engagement platforms.” The brief outlines some basic principles for those interested in going down this path followed by several examples from the field.

From what I have seen first-hand, researchers who successfully leverage engagement platforms have several characteristics in common. First and foremost, they are as much or more interested in doing research that results in real outcomes as they are in publication. They are open-minded and adaptable. They know their own limitations and they understand that “policy making” is a social process and that research results are not often a major factor influencing that process. They see research itself as a social process in which trust and relationships are as important as the research outputs.

Read CPWF briefing note: “Seven ways to catalyze African innovation through engagement platforms”

It’s not all about researchers

Researchers and their work are only part of the story, something those trained up in a classic research tradition can find difficult to come to grips with at first. The researcher is now one of several actors and not necessarily the most important. The engagement platform becomes the hub for any number of intermediary organizations, each with a vested interest in the outcomes and hence the direction of the research.

Examples of such intermediaries include Naga House in the Mekong, FANRPAN in the Limpopo and CONDESAN in the Andes.

In The New Invisible College: Science for Development, Caroline Wagner says, “Science operates at the global level as a network—an invisible college.” Wagner’s book is about extending that global network deeper into the national and local fabric. “The forces driving the emergence of the new invisible college can be discerned and put to work to improve productivity and distribution of scientific activity.” We believe engagement platforms are one of those forces.

Be sure to join us for a special side event on engagement platforms with special guest Dr. Lindiwe Sibanda, CEO FANRPAN if you are attending AASW. The event will be held on, Thursday, 18 July 2013 from 1330-1630 in Committee Hall 2 at the Accra International Conference Centre.

 

Learn more on CPWF Engagement Platforms

 

For updates follow us on @WLE_CGIAR and on Facebook.

Tags